Codemagic puts build logs, workflow state, artifacts, and release status in one place for a release owner to inspect. Strawberry can prepare the release check and failure summary, while the owner retains the decision to rerun a workflow, deploy a build, or publish to users.
01
A failed build is easier to act on when the evidence is already assembled.
With Codemagic open, Strawberry can help turn the visible build status, logs, and related browser context into a concise investigation handoff for the person who owns the fix.
02
Release readiness requires more than a green status badge.
A companion can prepare a checklist from the Codemagic workflow, release notes, and supporting pages you provide, so a release owner sees outstanding questions before choosing to proceed.
03
Build history can become a useful engineering summary.
Rather than scanning individual runs, Strawberry can assemble a narrative from the Codemagic views you select and state which patterns are visible versus merely possible.
04
Release preparation can be collected on a dependable schedule.
Before each release meeting, a Codemagic pass can collect the candidate build, failed workflow steps, test evidence, and missing release checks into one review packet. It never reruns a pipeline or promotes an artifact unreviewed, since that could deploy the wrong build to the wrong store or environment.
It can turn the Codemagic runs, logs, workflow details, and related repository tabs you open into release-readiness or failure-review packets.
No. Starting a build, moving a release, or publishing an app requires a specific approval from the release owner.
Yes. Before every release meeting, prepare the candidate build, workflow failures, artifact status, and remaining release checks for the release owner.
No. Codemagic remains responsible for build and release workflows; Strawberry helps the team arrive at the decision with context.
Codemagic Strawberry