At quarter end, the sustainability pass reconciles contributions, selected projects, impact evidence, and the wording planned for external reporting. An unreviewed public claim can overstate an organisation’s climate action or publish a figure that its supporting project evidence does not substantiate.
01
A climate claim needs the supporting project context.
Strawberry can collect the project information visible in Ecologi alongside the policy, campaign, or supplier pages you have open. It produces a source-linked brief instead of asking a teammate to reconcile claims from memory.
02
A contribution should be reviewed before it is committed.
The useful check is not merely the amount.
Strawberry can prepare the selected project, quantity, budget context, and intended public wording so a person can approve the whole decision together.
03
Impact updates should say what the evidence supports.
With the relevant account pages and reporting period open, Strawberry can turn the visible figures into a plain-language update that avoids adding claims the source does not establish.
04
Sustainability reporting benefits from a stable cadence.
At quarter end, the recurring pass gathers the contribution record, selected-project evidence, and every impact figure proposed for the report. Publishing without review risks putting an unsupported sustainability claim in front of customers, employees, or investors.
It can work from the Ecologi pages you open to prepare project research, contribution briefs, and reporting drafts.
No. Any purchase or contribution requires your explicit approval before it is completed.
Yes. It can prepare a cited draft from the browser context, but a responsible owner should verify claims before publishing.
Yes. At quarter end, it can assemble the contribution, project, evidence, and claim review packet while keeping both purchases and publication for approval.
Ecologi Strawberry