Strawberry vs Lindy

The slowest job of your week is usually the one nothing connects to.

Take the task you always do last because no tool helps with it.

Say it was moving the eighty saved reports out of the analytics tool you switch off next month, for your data lead. You have to open each report and see what it actually measures. You have to rebuild it in the tool you are moving to. Your data lead needs the numbers to match on the day of the switch.

That old tool will never get an integration. It is being decommissioned, so nobody is going to build one, and its export gives you a picture rather than a report.

Strawberry treats both tools like what they are, which is two websites. Your AI companion signs in as you, reads each report definition in the old one, and rebuilds it in the new one. The three it could not reproduce come back as a short list for you rather than as eighty guesses.

If you can do it in a browser, your AI companion can do it too.

Your AI companion signs into the old tool with your login, opens report forty-one and reads what it actually measures. The tool sees the same session it saw yesterday, because it is the same browser you have always used. Nothing had to be built for it first.

Lindy documents its integrations as connecting to the tools it works in, naming Gmail, Slack, Notion and Google Drive among them. It documents its Chrome extension as currently Gmail only, with Outlook coming soon.

Being the browser is also why Strawberry reaches 2,000+ integrations rather than a shortlist. So the messy half and the tidy half meet in one place. The definitions read out of the old tool become saved reports in the new one. The list of what could not be moved arrives in your sheet. The summary is posted in the channel where your data lead will see it.

The work should be done as you, in the accounts that are already yours.

Lindy documents two kinds of connection.

A personal connection is private to you. When an owner or admin shares one with the workspace, Lindy documents that everyone's Lindy then reads that tool as that account, and acts with its permissions.

In Strawberry the work runs in your own browser session and the accounts you connected yourself. The draft is in your inbox. The record shows your user. The permissions are the ones you already have, so nothing reaches further than you do.

You can also hold more than one account for the same app and choose the default. The agency login and your own can both be connected, and you pick which one a job runs against.

You should decide what it may read, not only what it may send.

Lindy documents guardrails per integration, set to always allow, require approval, or don't offer, and it documents that reads are never guarded because guardrails only cover writes.

Strawberry puts the setting on the action rather than the tool. Reading a record, drafting a message, sending it and deleting something get four separate answers, and reading is one of them. There is also one global setting that makes it ask about everything.

Anything set to ask opens an editable screen. Before a report definition is written into the new tool you see every field it will set, and you can change them. Before a message reaches your data lead you see the address it resolved and the exact text it will send.

The job should keep happening after you stop doing it by hand.

The migration will end. The jobs that nothing connects to will not.

Save the job once and Strawberry keeps how you like it done, then give it a schedule or a trigger such as a new email arriving. Every run is listed with its status, what it did and the credits it used, so the automated work is auditable rather than assumed. Lindy has recurring work too, documented as a routine with a trigger, a prompt in plain English, and a destination.

Then hand it over. Send the AI companion to your data lead and its memory, its skills and its configuration travel with it. Your connections do not, so the work runs on their login and their access, not on yours. Your team workspace holds the shared files and process, and shared team credits cover whoever needs them.

Frequently asked questions