Generating a description is easy; deciding whether it is appropriate for the image, page, audience, and publishing context is the important work. In an Alt Text Generator AI tab, Strawberry can help collect page evidence, structure the review, point out uncertainty, and make the editor’s final decision easier to inspect.
01
Do not confuse a generated sentence with an accessible explanation.
A generated description can identify objects while failing to convey what the image contributes to the page. Strawberry can help compare it with the visible content and frame the gap as a review question rather than a silent replacement.
02
Prioritise the images that carry real information.
Not every image deserves the same review time.
Data visuals, product instructions, primary navigation, and key editorial images often need more context than purely decorative material.
03
Show the editor why an item needs a decision.
A handoff is easiest to approve when the reviewer sees the page role, source image, suggested wording, and exact uncertainty at the same time. Strawberry can create that queue from the work open in the browser.
04
Turn the review pattern into an accessibility habit.
When the team trusts its criteria, save the process as an Alt Text Generator AI accessibility skill. A routine can prepare the queue on a schedule without making CMS edits.
Yes. Open Alt Text Generator AI in a Strawberry tab and ask a companion to help structure the page-context review.
It can flag context gaps and uncertainty, but an editor should make the final accessibility decision.
Yes. Save the criteria as a skill and use a routine to assemble a read-only review queue.
No. Strawberry can work in the Alt Text Generator AI tab you have already opened and signed in to. Keep the image, page copy, and editorial brief open or attached so the companion can review the context you provide.
Yes. Open the image and its destination page together. Strawberry can organise the visible page context and the proposed description into an editor-ready review, while the editor remains responsible for the final accessibility wording.