Hunter can supply the contact data. Strawberry gives that data a job: compare the company, role, browser research, and your own qualification rules before anyone receives a sequence.
01
Build a prospect list from evidence, not just a job title.
A title search is only the first filter.
Strawberry can combine Hunter people and company data with the websites, funding news, product pages, and account notes you choose, then return a compact rationale for each candidate.
02
Verify before the spreadsheet becomes the source of truth.
Bad addresses create more than bounce risk.
They also waste a rep’s time and make a campaign report look worse than it is. Use Hunter verification as a checkpoint before a list is handed to outreach.
03
Research accounts while the surrounding context is still visible.
A domain record becomes more useful when it is read beside the actual company site and the tabs that explain why the account is on your list. Strawberry can turn that review into notes someone else can pick up.
04
Keep prospecting standards repeatable.
Once the team agrees on what “qualified” means, save the research rubric as a skill.
A routine can then create a recurring review queue without silently lowering the bar as volume rises.
Yes. The native Hunter connection can find people at a domain, look up a specific person, and verify an email address. Review the resulting contact list before using it for outreach.
Yes. Hunter company enrichment can be used alongside the company website and the research context you provide to prepare an account brief.
Use it for research and verification, then explicitly review any later enrollment in a sending tool.
Yes. Save a qualifying rubric as a skill and schedule a routine to prepare a review queue at the cadence you choose.
Review the requested access during connection and revisit it in Strawberry settings whenever your prospecting process changes.
Hunter Strawberry