Try this skill in Strawberry

Prepare for Meetings

Help the user walk into a meeting knowing what matters, what they want from it, and what is worth asking. Start with a brief they can scan quickly and go deeper only when the meeting warrants it.

Use strawberry/sales/prepare-for-sales-meetings when prospect, customer, partner, pipeline, or account judgment is central. Use strawberry/recruiting/prepare-candidate-interviews for structured candidate-interview preparation. Continue here for general meetings and for the shared preparation work that does not depend on a specialist domain.

1. Find the meeting and the useful outcome

When the user refers to an upcoming, next, or named meeting, start from the calendar when possible. Resolve the event, timing, participants, purpose, and relevant organization or project. Match people carefully using attendee names, email addresses, domains, prior conversations, and relationship context. Ask when an identity or event match is genuinely unclear.

If Calendar is unavailable, continue from an invite, meeting link, open tab, uploaded material, or the details the user provides. Suggest a connection only when it would materially improve matching or save repeated setup.

Infer the result the user likely needs from the meeting: a decision, alignment, feedback, an introduction, an update, a difficult conversation, or a concrete next step. Confirm it only when the wrong assumption would change the brief. Scale the work to the time remaining and the stakes. If the meeting is imminent, give the essentials first.

2. Pull together only the context that matters

Start with the meeting itself, then use the sources most likely to change the conversation. These may include prior meeting notes, messages, email, project records, documents, dashboards, files, shared team context, and the user's open tabs or approved apps.

Use Strawberry's browser workspace when the useful context lives across real sites. Follow links through the user's visible tabs and logged-in tools, inspect the underlying records, and let the user see or take over the work. Research public people, company, market, or topic context only when it could improve the meeting; do not add a web-research layer by default.

Keep facts, prior decisions, other people's claims, and the user's private hypotheses distinct. Surface a conflict or missing record when it could change the meeting rather than smoothing it over.

3. Work out what could change the conversation

Prioritize the few things that should affect how the user shows up:

  • what has happened since the last relevant interaction;
  • open decisions, commitments, tensions, or dependencies;
  • what each important participant is likely responsible for;
  • material context the user may need to bring or explain;
  • questions that could reveal, resolve, or advance something; and
  • the outcome or next step worth aiming for.

Do not turn the brief into a biography, document summary, or project status dump. Include context because it changes a question, a decision, a risk, or the way the conversation should be handled.

4. Give the user a brief they can use

Default to a compact, bullet-led brief in chat. Adapt the shape to the meeting, but a useful result often includes:

  • Aim for: the desired outcome or decision;
  • Who and why now: the people, purpose, and latest relevant context;
  • Know: the few facts, commitments, or changes that matter;
  • Bring: a document, example, answer, or unresolved item;
  • Ask: a short set of useful questions; and
  • Watch for: a sensitive point, uncertainty, dependency, or decision boundary.

Put source links beside the claims they support when the user may need to verify or open them. Keep private notes out of any version intended for attendees or a wider team.

5. Review, share, and complete the loop

Let the user correct the depth, priorities, sources, and format after seeing a real brief. Share the approved version only with the agreed people and destination.

Strawberry's meeting capture can provide a transcript or other durable record without a visible meeting bot; capture is a product capability, not a separate skill to route through. After a general meeting, use strawberry/operations/debrief-a-meeting. Use the relevant specialist debrief when the meeting needs domain-specific judgment.

When the preparation pattern is genuinely repeatable, save the accepted method as a custom or team skill. A Routine may trigger before matching calendar events, check the agreed calendar, prior meetings, messages, projects, and other useful sources, then place a draft brief in the chosen destination. It should stop when the event or participant match is unclear, private context may be shared, or the brief depends on a decision only the user can make.

Five minutes before a meeting, you don't need a summary. You need to know what changed, and the one question worth asking.

That's spread across the invite, an old meeting note, a project thread, and the other side's website. Strawberry is a browser, so your companion can read all of it, including the tools you're already signed into, and come back with something short enough to use. Every claim shows its source.

Begin with what you need from the meeting

A board discussion, vendor review, project decision, one-to-one, and customer conversation need different preparation. Strawberry starts from the calendar event and the result you likely need: a decision, alignment, feedback, an introduction, an update, or a concrete next step. If the meeting is close, it can give you the essentials first.

When the meeting depends on specialist judgment, use the focused workflow for that domain. Sales preparation can reason about the account, opportunity, and commercial next step. Candidate-interview preparation can work from the accepted role criteria and scorecard.

Follow the context that could change the conversation

Your companion can move from the invite into earlier messages, project records, prior meetings, documents, dashboards, and relevant websites. It does not need every available source. It needs the few sources that change a question, explain a tension, confirm a promise, or reveal that the apparent plan is out of date.

This is where Strawberry's shared browser is useful. You can see which person, organization, and record the companion matched, open the supporting evidence, or take over the research. The brief does not arrive as a detached summary with no practical way to verify the path behind it.

Make the brief usable five minutes before the meeting

A practical brief normally fits in a quick scan: what to aim for, who is involved and why now, the few things worth knowing, what to bring, the questions worth asking, and any sensitive point or dependency to watch. Source links sit beside claims that may need checking.

Private hypotheses stay separate from anything shared with attendees. Facts, prior decisions, and other people's claims also remain distinct when collapsing them would give the user false confidence.

Carry the context through the meeting

Strawberry can capture supported conversations without adding a visible meeting bot. Afterward, the reliable record can feed a general meeting debrief or a specialist Sales or interview workflow. The preparation, conversation, and follow-through stay connected instead of asking you to explain the relationship again.

/debrief-a-meeting
/prepare-for-sales-meetings

Feedback on real briefs can teach your companion which sources you trust, how much depth helps, and the way you like to prepare. Once that method is reliable, a Routine can prepare briefs before matching calendar events and stop when the event, attendee, or privacy boundary is unclear.